Why US multinationals are reshoring key finance roles 

Over the past two years, regulatory change, instant payments adoption, dataresidency pressures, and renewed scrutiny on internal controls and cybersecurity have pushed many U.S. multinationals to move mission critical finance roles, tax, treasury, controllership, and FP&A, back onshore. This is less about labor arbitrage and more about risk reduction, speed of decision-making, and tighter strategic control. Below, we explore what is driving the shift, which roles are moving, and how to execute a high ROI reshoring plan.  

Regulation has become a location strategy 

Regulatory complexity has turned “where the work happens” into a strategic control choice for CFOs and audit committees. 

• Pillar two is a data and process challenge, not just a rate. As global minimum tax rules phased in across multiple jurisdictions in 2024–2025, the heaviest lift turned out to be data, controls, and countrylevel reporting. Leading firms advised that tax and finance teams must redesign processes, strengthen crossfunctional governance, and stand-up new technology to meet globe data requirements 

• The 2026 sidebyside package changes exposure, not the work. In January 2026, the OECD introduced a sidebyside package that allows many U.S.parented groups, starting with fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, to elect out of iir/utpr in favor of U.S. rules, while still dealing with local QDMTTS and globe information returns. The relief reduces topup tax exposure but does not eliminate data and compliance operations.  

• ESG/climate reporting may be in flux, but the data discipline remains. The SEC voted in March 2025 to withdraw its defense of the 2024 climate disclosure rule amid litigation, yet investors and several states continue to push for decisionuseful climate information, keeping many issuers on the path to stronger data, controls, and governance.  

• Cybersecurity disclosure rules are firmly in effect. The SEC’s 2023 cybersecurity disclosure rule requires public companies to report material incidents on form 8k within four business days and provide detailed governance and riskmanagement disclosures in annual reports. That compresses decision timelines and elevates disclosure controls—work that is easier to coordinate when core roles sit onshore.  

So what? Reshoring finance roles reduces coordination latency across tax, treasury, controllership, legal, its security, and investor relations, especially when reporting calendars, 8k clocks, and audit committee oversight collide. The goal is tighter control and faster, defensible judgments under U.S. regulatory timelines.  

Payments are instant, so treasury must be too 

Instantpayments rails in the U.S., RTP and FedNow, are now material to cash, liquidity, and working capital management. 

• RTP has scaled and increased limits. The Clearing House’s RTP network surpassed 1 billion total transactions by early 2025, reflecting rapid adoption across corporate and financial institutions. Transaction limits have moved up over time, with higher ceilings enabling more treasury use cases 

• FedNow participation is expanding rapidly. FedNow surpassed 1,000 participating institutions by late 2024, broadening reach beyond large banks and making 24/7 settlement a practical consideration for more corporates 

• Liquidity, fraud, and reconciliation operate on a 24/7 clock. Banks and payments providers emphasize that realtime rails reduce float, tighten receivables, and demand new risk controls and reconciliation capabilities, a shift that argues for consolidating treasury expertise closer to ERP owners, bank partners, and policy decisionmakers in the U.S.  

Result: Companies are reshoring cash management, bank connectivity, realtime reconciliation, and payment risk roles to integrate more closely with security, tax, accounting policy, and FP&A, and to sit under a single set of legal, supervisory, and disclosure expectations.  

Data residency and cloud choices reward proximity 

Finance is now a data business, but global datalocalization measures have multiplied and grown more restrictive, raising cost and complexity for crossborder data flows. 

• Localization measures are proliferating. The OECD has catalogued roughly 100 measures across 40 countries by early 2023, with many combining local storage mandates and flow prohibitions, the most restrictive form. This increases operating costs, can reduce resilience, and complicates compliance architectures.  

• Financialsector research warns about fragmentation. Policy analysis in 2024 argued that overly rigid localization limits can undermine cybersecurity, resilience, and even supervisory access, suggesting a principlesbased approach while acknowledging today’s patchwork reality.  

Implication: Many companies now prefer to anchor sensitive finance data, consolidation, and reporting platforms in the U.S., and to reshore the data owners, controllers, and finance systems product leaders who set standards for lineage, quality, and access.  

SOX modernization and cyber scrutiny are accelerating the pivot 

wo longrunning forces, SOX and cyber risk, are converging to favor onshore leadership. 

• SOX is moving to continuous controls and automation. 2024–2025 insights show programs shifting from periodic, manual testing to automated, realtime monitoring and analytics. That shift demands closer orchestration between finance, it, and security teams, coordination that is simpler with a domestic leadership spine and direct engagement with U.S. auditors 

• Cyber rules compress the timeline from incident to disclosure. With a fourbusinessday 8k clock, companies are retooling escalation and materiality procedures. Controllers, disclosure owners, and legal teams benefit from proximity to make faster, defensible judgments 

Bottom line: Reshoring internal controls, financial reporting, ITCG oversight, and technical accounting roles can materially reduce disclosure risk and audit surprises while enabling more automation in the control environment.  

GBS is evolving toward hybrid models and higher value 

Global business services (GBS) remain pivotal, but its mission is expanding “beyond the back office,” with genai and analytics high on the agenda. 

• Hybrid operating models are becoming standard. 2024–2025 surveys show leading organizations blending captives and outsourcing, nearshore and onshore, and remote and inoffice to balance cost, resiliency, and capability.  

• Finance SSOS are measured on speed and quality, not only cost. U.S.based SSOS benchmark against close cycle time, firstcontact resolution, and ERP simplification, metrics that depend on close alignment with onshore policysetters.  

Translation: Keep scalable transaction processing in hybrid GBS, but repatriate decisionrights, treasury policy, tax controversy, technical accounting, disclosure, and the finance data platform that feeds FP&A.  

Geopolitics, tariffs, and incentives reshaped the calculus 

Geopolitics and industrial policy have reconfigured supply chains and capital plans, and finance footprints tend to follow decision centers. 

• Tariff uncertainty has accelerated domestic decisions. Legal and advisory commentary during 2025 highlighted how broadbased tariff proposals and shifting trade policy pushed companies to rethink location strategies. While the headlines were about factories, finance leadership often moved with the strategy center.  

• Reshoring momentum is visible in manufacturing surveys. The 2025 Reshoring Initiative work, and related analyses emphasized risk, workforce, and total cost of ownership as catalysts beyond labor rates. When companies deepen U.S. operations, they typically elevate domestic finance, tax, and treasury leadership to manage incentives, credits, and stakeholder dialogue.  

Takeaway: Finance follows strategy. As multinationals regionalize production and capex, they frequently reshore the finance roles accountable for incentives, disclosures, and capital allocation.

Which roles are actually moving? 

Based on these drivers, four clusters of roles are most commonly reshored: 

1. Tax leadership and operations 

• Global tax accounting and reporting (pillar two data and GIR readiness): Companies need stronger entitylevel data, jurisdictional ETR analysis, and auditor coordination 

• Controversy and incentives: Teams are centralizing expertise to navigate QDMTTS, credits, and safeharbor elections. 

2. Treasury and payments 

• Liquidity operations and bank connectivity: Realtime rails require new playbooks for 24/7 reconciliation, fraud, and liquidity forecasting.  

• Payment risk and policy: Proximity to security, legal, and accounting policy reduces response times and improves control design.  

3. Controllership, reporting, and SOX 

• Internal controls and ITGC leadership: Continuous controls and automation are easier to deploy with onshore leadership aligned to auditor expectations.  

• Technical accounting and external reporting: Faster materiality judgments and coherent 8k/10k narratives favor onshore decisionmakers.  

4. FP&A and finance data platforms 

• Finance data product owners and architects: Standardizing lineage, residency, and access across ERPS and data lakes is best led under a single jurisdiction  

• Advanced analytics and workingcapital modeling: Instantpayments adoption feeds new cashflow models that sit close to treasury and controllership 

Why not just nearshore? 

Nearshoring (especially to LATAM) remains compelling for transactional finance and analytics due to timezone alignment and cost. However, roles with signoff, disclosure risk, or board exposure benefit from onshore proximity and U.S. legal coverage. The pragmatic answer is a hybrid model: keep scale where risk is low; reshore where risk is high.  

How to execute a high ROI reshoring plan 

1) Pinpoint the “riskdense” workflows. Map where timesensitive judgments intersect with regulatory exposure: pillar two data assembly; 8k cyberincident triggers; closetodisclose; liquidity events on instant rails. Those process nodes are prime candidates for U.S. leadership and staffing  

2) Design your finance operating model, hybrid by default. Anchor policy and disclosure onshore; keep scalable transaction processing in hybrid GBS aligned to SLAS and control standards. Leading GBS organizations are already blending captives and outsourcing while prioritizing digital capabilities  

3) Rebuild the data backbone before moving people. Rationalize entity, ledger, and tax data; define a single source of truth; and implement access controls that satisfy cyber and localization constraints. Research warns about the cost and resilience downsides of fragmented localization; a U.S.anchored finance data platform with controlled interfaces to regional systems mitigates those risks 

4) Modernize SOX alongside the move. Use the transition to embed continuous monitoring, automated reconciliations, and exception workflows; align with auditors on testing redesign and evidence. Firms report efficiency gains and better risk signal when SOX modernization coincides with organizational redesign 

5) Build treasury for realtime. Define instantpayment use cases (payables, refunds, payroll), recalibrate fraud and sanctions screening for 24/7 operations, and link liquidity analytics to realtime settlement. Participation and transaction ceilings on RTP/FedNow make realtime a mainstream treasury tool 

6) Rehearse cybertodisclosure drills. Simulate incident materiality determinations and disclosure timelines; clarify how finance, legal, it, and comms interact under the fourday 8k clock. Onshore controllers and disclosure owners reduce decision latency 

7) Plan the people strategy. Select U.S. hubs tied to banks, auditors, and regulators. Build internal mobility from GBS to onshore roles to retain institutional knowledge. Sharedservices research shows that talent pipelines and analytics skills are key maturity levers, extend that thinking onshore.  

What success looks like 

• Faster closetodisclose: Fewer postclose adjustments, cleaner audit points, and stable 10k/10q cycles despite regulatory change 

• Pillar two readiness without firefighting: Timely GIR drafts, confident safeharbor positions, and coordinated GDMTT interactions 

• Treasury yield uplift: Measurable workingcapital improvements tied to instantpayments adoption and better bankdata visibility 

• Cyberincident discipline: Rehearsed playbooks that meet fourday 8k requirements without governance scrambles 

• Audit and SOX efficiency: More automated controls, fewer manual walkthroughs, and improved firsttimeright testing 

Bottom line: risk, speed, and credibility beat cheap 

The last few years have shown that finance location strategy is a risk decision. With pillar two entering a more U.S.aligned era (but not going away), cybersecurity rules compressing disclosure timelines, and instantpayments transforming liquidity, leading companies are doubling down on onshore leadership for the finance activities that carry disclosure and regulatory exposure. They are keeping scale where it belongs, in hybrid GBS, but bringing judgment, policy, and accountability back to the U.S. The payoff is not only compliance; it is the operational agility and investor credibility that come from tighter control of both the numbers and the narrative. 

Ready to hire US-based tax, treasury or finance professionals in the USA?  

If you’re planning to build out your local finance function, partner with a search team that knows how to operate silently and deliver visibly. 

Get in touch with us at Brewer Morris to discuss a tailored silent search that protects confidentiality and brings you the best candidates with the right cultural fit, the right outcomes and the right impact.